Wednesday 12 October 2016

Ives Stillwell is consistent with classical theory of emr.

There are various erroneous claims made by relativists from Einstein through Ives Stillwell to the present. All of them claim that a classical model predicts no offset for the Ives Stillwell experiment. As we know, an offset is observed. Supposedly validifying relativity and ruling out a classical model of light where observed speeds of light are assumed to be c+-v. The reason why this erroneous claim has survived unchallenged for so long is simple. The various formulas evoked for "classical" are actually not correctly modelling light as c+-v. If one wishes to *correctly* model observed speeds for classical the following formula must be used. (Assuming v is 0.005, and f is the emitted source frequency as in the Ives Stillwell experiment) 1.005 X f = f1(forward) 0.995 X f = f2(rearward) Calculate the two Doppler shifted frequencies. Convert both shifted frequencies f1&2 to wavelength w1&2 and average them out ((w-w1)+(w2-w)/2). This gives an average predicted offset for classical , that matches the observed offset in the Ives Stillwell experiment. Verifying that a classical model is consistent with Ives Stillwell.