The latest so called detection of a gravitational wave GW 170817 is particularly suspicious. Notably the SNR for the two signals at LIGO are indeed strong. But too strong to not be detected in VIRGO. The excuse being that it arrived in VIRGOs blind spot! That's two so called detections in the same month that rely on explaining the non detection in VIRGO as being explained by saying both arrived in the very small blind spot window for VIRGO. A convenient coincidence. But nonetheless too convenient. Especially considering that the so called confirmation detection by Fermi of a related GRB was also fabricated well after the event. But made to look in press releases and papers to be triggers detected simulataneously.
In fact if one looks at the time sequence of this so called Gravitational Wave its provenance begins to fall apart. For starters as already mentioned there was no detection in VIRGO, contrary to the claims by theorists. VIRGO did not trigger on this. What happened was two very strong minute long signals , most likely environmental, triggered both LIGO detectors. Unusual and very noticeable. And not signal types ever predicted. A new type of event was manufactured and theorists went back to VIRGO to scour the LIGO event time frame. They found a convenient low SNR random event to match in the Fermi data and then claimed that somehow this event must have come from a direction defined as one that would arrive in VIRGOs blind spot. The theorist tried spuriously to pretend that this non detection in VIRGO was actually a detection in VIRGO! By virtue of the fact that it wasn't detected and therefore must have arrived in its blind spot. Questionable indeed. Then, to compound the hoax, theorists realised that they needed an associated event in optical and gamma to back up their erroneous conclusion that a strong LIGO signal like this could only be from nearby. So they went back to Fermi data, scoured it and found a low SNR signal in the noise and pretended this weak blip was actually an associated GRB. Then announced it eight hours later. If one looks at GCN we can see a "trigger" was then announced . Eight hours after a real trigger should have automatically been announced! The theorists needed this fabricated fermi trigger on the record to validate their claims. Notice no mention of the fact by theorists that in fact Fermi didn't trigger on this event. Rather they pretend that the official GCN released eight hours later was actually released eight hours earlier and coincident with the actual LIGO event. A lie.
At this point all the worlds telescopes and radio arrays were then pointed at this small region of space. It is worth noting that if the worlds telescopes had been pointed at any similar region at the same time, the same sort of observations of variable sources etc could be made and supplied as evidence of an optical verification.
This GW was indeed a notorious hoax. By a desperate theoretical community made within days of LIGO closing. Obviously a success was needed to continue funding for the fake Gravitational wave community.
Where is the observed time delay for GW 170817? Nowhere.
What is even more questionable about the research surrounding GW 170817 is the fact that in the official paper on the gravitational wave no mention is made of what is possibly the most important piece of evidence needed to confirm this is indeed a gravitational wave as predicted by relativity theory. This missing data is the time delay between the arrival times of the seperate detections in each of the LIGO detectors at Hanford and Livingston. Where is this vital piece of information? How do the theorists prove that the time delay is only in a few milliseconds at most as dictated by GR?
A serious flaw in the otherwise even more seriously flawed theoretical assumptions and interpretations made from the observed data.
