Wave interference: Creating true 3D using LCD technology

Wave interference: 3D LCD viewer


A commonly observed interference pattern is one seen through overlapping grid mesh fences as one moves past them. If there is another fence or grid like screen behind the front fence, as one moves past the system an overlapping pattern of moving dark and light interference patterns are observed. Interference patterns created as light travels through the grid patterns of the fences to your moving eye.
Similar to effects described in optics where the interference patterns made from overlapping incident waves are observed on a screen. Young interference fringes being the classic example.
An example of moving interference fringes from 2 overlapping grid mesh screens can be seen at...
3D image
3D images

The resulting observed interference patterns of overlapping grids as shown in the above fence description depend on what grid pattern is particular to each of the two overlapping grids.
So for instance two overlapping grids consisting of vertical bars will create to the distant viewer interference patterns of much larger light and dark bars.
Or, two overlapping grids made of a cross mesh of horizontal and vertical strands will give to a distant viewer an image of much larger square grid pattern.
My experience is that two identical overlapping grid patterns about two meters apart and consisting of grid square meshes of about 2 inches spacing between wires, when seen by an observer from a distance of 100 feet approx will give interference square grid patterns of about ten times the size of the initial 2 grids


How to use this effect to make a standalone 3D image screen. I.e. A 3D tv screen that is an image from a screen that supplies the 3D image to the viewer who sits at a distance from the screen without the viewer needing 3D goggles.

Basically duplicate the effect mentioned above of the overlapping fences of grid mesh patterns. But on a MUCH a smaller scale using LCD technology.
So instead of:
A)two grids of 20cm spaced vertical and horizontal wires, each grid spaced two meters apart from the other and viewed by an observer at 200 meters distance.
One has:
B) two overlapping transparent LCD screens each with grid image of vertical and horizontal lines each spaced .02mm apart, each screen spaced approx .02 cm apart and observed by a viewer at 20 cm distance.
Provided each LCD was transparent and both are backlit by the same source a 3D image of a much larger grid pattern than the two overlapping LCD screens should be observable.
Moving or changing the grid on one layer relative to the other should give animated motion to the observed interference patterns.
Presumably complex moving overlapping patterns on each LCD grid would give complex and or realistic effects of images in 3D to the viewer.
Without the need for 3D goggles.

Magnetism: polarity.The atom as a resonating system

How to explain why an atom has polarity in its N-S magnetic field. Other pages here on this blog show how an atom is comprised of multiple overlapping nodes of different resonant frequencies. As shown in illustration below which has waves of one frequency converging into central nodal point. That point being the theoretical center of the atom.

The illustration gives a depth to the standing wave as it would appear to be in water where incoming waves are observed to create vertical standing waves. However for atoms the waves have no depth as they are oscillating north and south magnetic fields.
The north south polarity of the standing wave in an emr based atom would then be observed to oscillate back and forth at many times per second. Dictated by the different incoming frequency of radiation.

Of course the argument would then be that an atoms N-S polarity is not observed to oscillate between north and south....this doesn't explain polarity of each end of the axis of magnetism nor does it explain how such a model could explain opposing n-n fields for instance.
But maybe it could. One possibility is that any atom that oscillates at one frequency will always be north or south along that vertical axis. So any other nearby atom that oscillates in the same frequency but opposing polarity ( pointing down when the other atom points up) would be forced or force the two to reoriente so that they were both oscillating at the same frequency with the same polarity in the same direction.. The polarity being that both would have to be oriented so that generally both point up or down *at the same time*.
So in summary, all atoms oscillate their magnetic fields rapidly between north and south. And the observed polarity comes from when an atoms north south field is oscillating at the same time or opposite to an adjacent atom.
If at the same time then both atoms will orient themselves along the same axis. If opposite then the two will orient themselves on the same axis but one will flip over so that its north is always up when the others North Pole is also up.

Seperate to this is another possible explanation of which I have more recently contemplated. If wave electromagnetic radiation from the rest of the infinitely large universe creates the standing  wave of the atom at one point in space. Then this radiation  could be only from sources where the motion of the source is away from the atom. And travelling away at a speed of exactly c, Creating a non moving wave that overlaps with non moving standing waves from other directions. (This method is easier to explain in video simulation of which I hope to soon make available. But if one looks at the above illustration. Rather than having the emr waves travelling through the center point and creating an oscillating North South polarity at its center, imagine instead those waves in the above illustration are from sources moving away at c. And thus are standing still rather than moving through the center point of the atom. Creating a magnetic pole where North always points in the same direction.) The advantage of this model is there is no oscillating waves creating the nodal center point of the atom. So the north south polarity doesn’t change and is consistent with current observations of atoms. Which always have a non changing N-S polarity. (Unlike the rapidly oscillating N-S polarisation described above in the first model on this blogpost..)