Element Conductivity

Elements are arranged here in the associated graph by conductivity v. atomic number. There is a pattern that emerges from organizing these elements by number that does not appear when arranged in the usual periodic table layout. Particularly noticeable is the repeating structure denoted by Cu and highlited in blue. The highlited blue structure of the peak associated with Copper can be overlayed on top of the other three main peaked structures (denoted on the graph by Al,Ag and Au) and make exact matches . In other words each of the 4 peaks and their associated structures are similar in profile to the other 3.For instance in the Copper feature on the graph there are 3 other subsidiary peaks at Ca(20)Co(27) & Cr(24). each of these three seems to have corresponding matches in the other sets. For instance the Ca peak feature from the Cu set has matches in the other 3 sets of Be, Rb/Sr and Yb. Or the Co feature from the Cu set has matches from the other sets of Na/Mg,Rh and Ir.I have compiled these into 4`subsets` as follows.

Set 1) Cu, Al, Ag, Au

Set 2) Ca, Be, Rb/Sr, Yb

Set 3) Co, Na/Mg, Rh, Ir

Set 4) Cr, -, Mo, W

It would be of interest to see if each of these above 4 subsets of elements have any other properties that are common to that subset only. For instance do Ca,Be Rb/Sr and Yb share anyparticular common property unique to that subset alone or even in relation to the whole periodic table?

Common absorption features in observed frame GRB spectra

This graph shows 6 grb spectra in the observed frame. (The spectra of grb030329 shows the progression from day 4 to day 27 of the spectra). The red lines superimposed on the grb spectra show how many of the same absorption systems are common to all the six restframe spectra. This is a too large frequency of common features between the different spectra to be coincidence. And shows that many absorption features in the grb observed frame spectra must be imposed locally ( by the solar wind) on the afterglow and not at the cosmologically distant grb source. This observed frame explanation for the common features also explains the observations made by Prochter and Prochaska in 2006 that that galaxies appear to be four times more common in the direction of gamma-ray bursts than in the direction of quasars.

This url provides explanations for various physical phenomena using traditional classical physics.For explanations on how grbs, sagnac effect , the earths magnetic field and other phenomena can be explained by a classical model see the simulations http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=jaymoseleygrb