Scientists pin down the origins of a fast radio burst (MIT)

“Magnetospheric origin of a fast radio burst constrained using scintillation. Kenzie Nimmo2024”

Once again the ‘experts’ continue to make up ridiculous fantastical scenarios to try to explain why FRB’s do not conform to relativity and its constant speed of light in all frames nonsense. A sad history of ignoring the facts that started in 1928 when Hubble found that light changed frequency over distance which refuted Einsteins photon model. And by association refuted his relativity theories which relied on the erroneous assumption that a photon can NOT change frequency over distance.

The real story of FRB’s is that they are just very fast GRB’s. The length of a GRB lightcurve is usually in the order of seconds with the optical counterpart in hours and radio in days as modelled here. But an FRB, being just a very fast short GRB, will have its gamma lightcurve last only in nano seconds, its optical curve in slightly longer nanosecond timescales and the radio transient being the only observable lightcurve, lasting in microseconds. Just long enough to capture as an event in the radio data.

Dark Energy is Misidentification of Variations in Kinetic Energy of Universe’s Expansion

 A new way to save an old oft refuted theory: 

https://www.sci.news/astronomy/dark-energy-13531.html

“A simple expansion law consistent with Einstein’s general relativity does not have to obey Friedmann’s equation.” Wiltshire et al 2024. 

Translation into English: “ The Big Bang doesn’t seem to be expanding at the rate predicted by the Big Bang theory. This is a confirmation of how great the BigBang theory is.”  !?

To save the pre Copernican flat earth inspired Big Bang theory, the theorists have now invoked the powers of Relativity to make that what is in essence a sows ear still look like a silk purse. 

What Wiltshire forgot to say say was that the Big Bang theory itself was invented in 1928 to save both of Einsteins theories of relativity. Because in 1928 Einstein was God. And in 1928 his photon model, proposed by Albert just before his first relativity paper to make sure his theories of relativity weren’t refuted by the prevailing ( and correct) wave only theory of light, had just been proved wrong by Hubble and his newly observed cosmological redshift of light. Which showed that light did change frequency over distance. Something Alberts photon predicted was impossible. 

So now we are full circle in relativity lala land. Relativity is being used to save the Big Bang fantasy. A century after the imaginary Big Bang fantasy was invented to save the nonsense of Einsteins photon reliant theory of Relativity.

First demonstration of quantum teleportation over busy Internet cables

Quantum teleportation coexisting with classical communications in optical fiber. Thomas et al 2024. https://opg.optica.org/optica/fulltext.cfm?uri=optica-11-12-1700&id=565936

Sounds to me like all they really have done in this paper is use the latest technology in fibre optics and recent observations of light scattering to send the imaginary quantum “entangled photons” down a very narrow bandwidth in a fibre optic cable. A bandwidth which is deemed to be less ‘busy’. And then pretend because that particular wavelength for  the entangled signal was essentially cleared of all other offending data except the experimental signal it must be proof that somehow this implied two imaginary photons were “entangled” when surrounded by busy internet traffic in other wavelengths in the same fibre.

Two problems here. First is that these type of quantum entangled experiments always only compare signals AFTER they have been received at a detector. That’s called coincidence counting. Quantum theorists forget that the coincident counters in any entanglement experiment always collects and collates the data from different detectors arriving at different times down different length paths and then pretends that comparing the data later proves imaginary particles were somehow entangled. For more information on this misconception read Here .

And second, that by placing a horizontally polarised filter after a vertically polarised filter somehow this is proof that a magic quantum party trick was performed when no light comes through the two crossed filters. 

There is no quantum magic in clearing out a particular range of wavelengths using filters etc. in the fibre and only sending and measuring data encoded within that narrow cleared bandwidth. That’s just an improvement in fibre optic manufacturing technology. 

Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models

 Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models

Seifert et al. 2024

https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article/537/1/L55/7926647?login=false

https://phys.org/news/2024-12-dark-energy-doesnt-lumpy-universe.html

Another article on imaginary dark energy. Looks like theorists are finally admitting it is imaginary after all. But now fortunately we have new improved Timescape. Astrophysics has its latest excuse for the continued failure of the BBT to explain any of the data since the priest LeMaitre recycled the creation myth as an expanding universe. His attempt to explain why Hubbles observed redshifted light over distance was not consistent with Einsteins’ photon model. A photon model which incidentally, predicts that photons cannot change frequency over distance. 

It’s worth pointing out the fact that Hubble himself didn’t believe in expansion. Being a good scientist he knew that cosmological redshift must just be EMR changing frequency over distance rather than an imaginary divine event at the beginning of time. Because the fact is that the Sn1a data that led the BBT community to scratch their collective heads in 1998, is not showing any expansion at all let alone acceleration. 

Best chi fits of SN1a data to z=0 here show that the SN1a data best fits a non expanding model. 

And this contradiction between no observed time dilation in any data and imaginary dilation predicted by the BBT expansion was starting to look really bad for the BBT.

The best way out of this conundrum is to change the data to make it look like there’s a Big Bang, even when the JWST and other data shows there isn’t.

And now thanks to Timescape, a new improved better excuse has been invented and the BBT is safe again for a while. To account for observed non dilated lightcurves and various other BBT predictions recently refuted by the JWST data, Timescape offers the BBT a way out of its self induced mess. By saying that yes the universe is expanding, but it’s just that imaginary effects due to general relativity mean that it just doesn’t look like it’s expanding!! Which is why the data shows no expansion. 

All you need is faith.

Earth’s inner core may be changing shape

 Once again predictions made in my 2009 paper published here have been verified. Further confirming the predictions made by my Variable speed Inner Core Earth Dynamo model and outlined in the paper at the above link. To summarise: In the paper I proposed that earths inner solid core rotates at different speeds to the mantle and the more liquid outer core. Sometimes faster sometimes slower and creating the field reversals seen in the geomagnetic record. And that the inner cores rotation speed is dictated by an off centered asymmetric volume that changes over time to become elongated in the north south axis to flattened at the equator. It is this changing shape which dictates its relative speed to the outer liquid core and the mantle. In the same way that a spinning ballet dancer can increase or decrease their rotational speed by stretching out or retracting their arms to speed up or slow down their rotation.

The irony is that when I initially tried to publish in a peer reviewed journal in 2009, the paper was rejected because I had no evidence that the earths core was changing or had ever changed shape as my model had proposed! 

Quantum Theory refuted again

Looks like they discovered that the so called “ Space Quantisation” explanation for the Stern Gerlach theory was incorrect. The split beams can be explained classically. And the theoretical discreet jumps in an atoms reaction to an applied external field never materialised once technology was actually able to measure an effect so small. It seems that recent published research found that the atomic response to an applied field went up exponentially as described by a classical model. Rather than in discreet jumps as QT has erroneously claimed since 1922. More on this can be read here... https://phys.org/news/2024-12-particle-mass.html

“ When a magnetic field is applied to any material, the energy levels of electrons inside that material become quantized into discrete levels called Landau levels, Shao explained. The levels can only have fixed values, like climbing a set of stairs with no little steps in between. The spacing between these levels depends on the mass of the electrons and the strength of the magnetic field, so as the magnetic field increases, the energy levels of the electrons should increase by set amounts based entirely on their mass—but in this case, they didn't.

Using the high-powered magnet in Florida, the researchers observed that the energy of the Landau level transitions in the ZrSiS crystal followed a completely different pattern of dependence on the magnetic field strength. Years ago, theorists had labeled this pattern the "B2/3 power law," the key signature of semi-Dirac fermions. “ Yinming Shao et al 2024

Stern Gerlach experiment 1922

In the original 1922 Stern Gerlach experiment the single horizontally propagating incident beam was split into two ‘up’ or ‘down’ diverging beams. An observation not consistent with predictions of the time which were that the path deflection angles in a classical model should be deflected up or down in only an even range of angles. Here it is proposed that net translational forces on a dipole in an inhomogeneous field can correctly model the observed split paths for a classical model. In that the dipoles will initially experience a range of very small path deflections via the up or down net translational forces on them as they enter the apparatus. A deflection force dependent upon the specific angle of the N-S axis of polarity of each incident dipole relative to the applied external N-S field in the apparatus. This separation of the beam into 2 paths, one up and one down is effectively a classical version of the “space quantisation” often referred to in QT. After entering the field, the dipoles will then have been sorted into two up and down paths as well as each path having a range of these very small different angled path deflections from the horizontal incident path. They will then all each experience an additional amount of net translational forces applied equally on all aligned dipoles as they propagate through the 3.2 cm length of the external field. Separating the 2 up and down sets into two distinct paths.

Introduction

Spin is a theoretical construct that seems to be preventing Quantum theorists from finding simpler solutions to experiments based on classical models only. Here it is proposed that if atoms are treated as magnetic dipoles subject to inhomogeneous magnetic fields, then the Stern Gerlach experiment can be explained sufficiently by a classical model.

We know in the experiment that the incident beam must consist of all angles of dipole polarisations. And so it follows that statistically this must be a 50/50 split. That is half must have their N pole facing up from any angle between horizontal to perpendicular to the beam path. And the other half must have the same range of angles between 0-90 degrees but all with their N pole facing down. And we know separately from experimental observations that a dipole will be repelled if its N pole faces towards the N pole of an external field. Or attracted if its S pole faces the external field’s N Pole. Implying that in a classical model, as it is also expected to do in QT, half of the dipoles will be initially deflected upwards in a range of angles by the external field. And half deflected downwards. Separately there is also a statistical preference for a greater number of dipoles with their N-S dipoles fields facing parallel to the direction of motion of the dipole in a beam.

In accordance with well accepted classical models of net force on dipoles in inhomogeneous fields each atom in the incident beam will experience a path deflection upon entering an inhomogeneous magnetic field depending on each incident atom’s dipole field angle relative to the external field. This path deflection is proportional to the net translational force imposed on the dipole by the inhomogeneous external field of the S -G apparatus. As illustrated in Fig 1, a dipole whose field angle is closest to perpendicular to the inhomogeneous field will receive the least net force. And a dipole oriented with its field parallel to the external field will receive the greatest net up or down force. It is at this moment of entry into the external magnetic field of the apparatus that this range of positive or negative deflections on the dipole paths are effected. And once inside the field, all dipole fields are now aligned N-S with the external field. From which point on a net translational force is then applied equally to all the now aligned dipoles as they pass through the 3.2 cm length of the inhomogeneous magnetic field part of the apparatus. A net up or down translational force which pulls the two “quantised” north south beams of dipoles farther and farther apart in curved paths. With each dipole receiving the same amount of net force up or down as all of the other dipoles. Illustrated in Fig 1 as the curved paths showing the effect of the constant up or down net translational forces on the moving dipoles. This net force eventually separates the beam into 2 North and south paths at the image plane. As is observed in the original S-G experiment. This initial up down range of path splitting of the deflected beams atoms based on incident dipole angles is essentially what is usually referred to as space quantisation in QT.

Separately, it is worth pointing out here that currently no published experiments showing the multiple beam paths predicted for other elements in a S-G apparatus and predicted by Quantum theory has ever been successfully completed. All available reference show that all single element S-G style tests always gave only the same double humped split paths in the image plane as the silver atoms did in the original experiment. Casting serious doubts over the validity of Quantum theory and its failed ‘space quantisation’ multi path predictions for atomic elements other than silver.

Quantisation into Positive or negative paths in a classical model

It is important here to explain in more detail how the beam splitting can be explained classically. In that the even spread of angles of dipole fields in the experiment, as predicted by a Classical model in 1922, can still be made consistent with the observed split paths at the image plane without invoking space quantisation. The answer lies in the fact that after the dipoles have upon entry aligned themselves with the external field, the net translational force up or down on a dipole will be constant for all dipoles travelling in the horizontal beam equally as they pass through the rest of the 3.2 cm of external N-S field. Which means that all angles of paths with up (down) directions will now be pulled up (down) additionally by the same amount of force away from their original horizontal path. Take for example a dipole whose path angle away from the horizontal after entering the field will have been deflected upwards by a very small path deviation of an angle of only 0.00000001 degrees. If one calculates what path deflection that would give after travelling 3.2 cm it would not be measurable. This is also close enough to be statistically considered as zero dipoles in the beam at this angle for the purposes of modelling the experiment. But after it travels through the 3.2 cm of the beam this aligned dipole will also have been subjected to a total additional amount of net up translational force from the external field. And that total would have deflected the dipole up by an additional angle to its path to become measurable. That amount in the Stern Gerlach experiment was observed to be between a 0.1mm to 0.2mm path shift from the original horizontal path. Effectively creating the atom free empty middle band in the image plane in a classical model.

Stage 2 and 3 deflection paths modelled classically

To make stages 2 and 3 also consistent with a classical model one can then assume that after stage 1 as outlined above, all the silver atoms polarities have field directions that match the inhomogeneous field of stage 1. When travelling through the stage 2 inhomogeneous field, which is also in the same magnetic field orientation as stage 1, no splitting of the beam will occur in stage 2. As the beam of silver atoms polarities are now lined up with both the stage 1 and 2 external fields. The beam will only be deflected up towards the stronger N pole of the external field due to net translational forces on each dipole in the beam. And proceed as a single deflected beam to stage 3. In stage 3 the dipole alignment process resets and starts over again to repeat the same splitting process as seen in stage 1. Because the beam entering stage 3 has all its atoms polarities in the beam now aligned at right angles to the applied inhomogeneous field in stage 3. And therefore, all dipoles will have to have their polarities rotated and deflected up or down so as to be re-aligned again to the stage 3 external field. Unfortunately, this purely classical effect seen in stages 2 and 3 is also often misinterpreted in QT as space quantisation.

Summary and conclusion

Upon entry into the inhomogeneous field of the apparatus the incident dipoles experience an initial deflection proportional to the angle between the specific dipole field angle and the direction of the inhomogeneous external field. This sorts the incoming beam into two sets of paths. One up and one down. Each path has a range of deflection angles from the original beam path. Deflections which are still much too small to be measurable at the image plane in Stern Gerlach. It is important to note that at this point all the atoms have also had their dipole field angles re-aligned with the North South external field by rotational force.

What is remarkable is that Quantum theorists then and now have been unable to understand the basics of net translational magnetic effects on dipoles. In that they don’t seem to realise that net force initially separates the dipoles into either up or down paths upon their entry into the external field with a range of net forces proportional to the incident dipole angles. At which point the now aligned dipoles in each set all experience the same total of net translational force from the external field as they continue on through the 3.2 cm path in the apparatus. And it is this net force which further separates the up or down sets to become observable as two separate beams at the other end of the apparatus field. 

Reference

1. The Stern-Gerlach Experiment Translation of: “Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld” 2023 Martin Bauer