Inner core backtracking by seismic waveform change reversals. Wang et al 2024

With regards to a recent paper in Nature titled  ‘Inner core backtracking by seismic waveform change reversals’ Wang et al 2024

I would like to point out here that the authors have ignored or were unaware of a theoretical model of the dynamo that drives the earths magnetic field that Inpublished in 2008 here on this blog. I predicted in this 2008 paper that the earths more solid inner core rotates at different speeds from the outer mantle. And is now beginning to slow down its rotation speed relative to the mantle. I notice that this Nature paper, using the latest data and recently published, confirms my 2008 predictions. Without giving any credit to my earlier predictions which I must point out predates their papers conclusions by almost 2 decades.  

Please notice the last paragraph of the my 2008 paper and linked below. It predicts the inner core is beginning to slow down. http://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2008/12/earths-magnetic-field.html

Earths inner core slowing and coming to a stop.

 Once again the latest research confirms a prediction made by my theoretical model of the earths core and its associated magnetic field. The main feature of this recent paper is the “surprising” observation by authors of the paper cited below, that the earths inner core appears to slowing and possibly may go into reverse in the very near future.! Not previously expected or ever predicted in any peer reviewed paper. 

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367351565_Multidecadal_variation_of_the_Earth%27s_inner-core_rotation

This observation in this latest 2024 paper was also predicted in my paper and first published here on this blog in 2008. After unfortunately having been rejected by Elseviers Earths Science journal as having its predictions “not quantitively confirmed by observations”

A strange excuse for a journal to make seeing as my model used all the observed data that any other peer reviewed published model had ever used. Not to mention the oft confirmed fact that since then all other models predictions have subsequently failed or at least had to be revised. Whereas my model continues to successfully model all the observed data to date. As the above Researchgate paper once again confirms. I suppose what this shows is that established peer reviewed physics prime guiding rule to getting published is that it must never ever successfully predict any future data.

The link to my paper and it’s prediction that the inner core rotation is slowing and will soon come to stop and reverse is made is at:

http://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2008/12/earths-magnetic-field.html