Photon from GRB travelled 2 billion light years, impossible under current theory.

In a recent article apparently an impossibly high energy photon was “observed” to have travelled 2 billion light years before being observed here on earth. Currently theory has GRB’s as massive cosmic explosions. Yet since the 90’s this model has consistently failed to predict each new set of GRB observations.  The reason for this consistent record of failure of GRB theory lies as usual with relativity theory. The theoretical backbone of all faked current and past GRB models.

However this problem does not occur if one assumes (the well observed fact) that light is wave only and travels at c only relative to its source then all of the last 100 or so years of failed predictions from black hole, Big Bang  and gammaray bursts theories can be avoided. As pointed out numerous times here on this blog.

Because if one ignores the false assumptions of relativity and its misguided progeny the Big Bang theory, then a GRB can be explained, not as an explosion, but rather as a rapidly red shifting stellar source in a non expanding universe from great cosmological distances being observed here on earth. An optical illusion rather than a real explosion. An “explosion” model which incidentally  has consistently failed to model each new set of observed data on GRB’s year on year since the early 90’s when theorists thought they must be either nuclear tests by Russians or at best supernovae like explosions from within our own galaxy. When at the same time in the early nineties the red shifting optical illusion model described in this blog which predicted, among other consistently successful predictions, that they would appear to be isotropic in the sky and have self similar light curves extending to highest ( and lowest) energies possible. These latest “impossibly high” energies have been predicted for 35 years. And for two decades here on this blog. 

The big question is: How much longer will it be before the scientific community wakes up and realises that relativity and the Big Bang theory are pseudoscience at best.

For more details on a GRB Theory that for decades has successfully predicted all known GRB observations to date please read the following and other posts from this blog:

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2014/08/this-following-brief-description-of-grb.html

http://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2014/08/this-following-brief-description-of-grb.html

FRB 20250316A: A Brilliant and Nearby One-off Fast Radio Burst Localized to 13 pc Precision

FRB 20250316A: A Brilliant and Nearby One-off Fast Radio Burst Localized to 13 pc Precision

The CHIME/FRB Collaboration:, Thomas C. Abbott

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/adf62f#apjladf62fs3

Once again the theorists have misunderstood the true nature of FRB and GRB phenomena. As I have pointed out for decades on this blog, it is a mistake to assume they are massive “explosions” at cosmological scale distances from earth. This is a false assumption based on other false assumptions about our universe and the true nature of electromagnetic radiation. False and unsubstantiated assumptions which I have discussed and refuted elsewhere here on this blog

However, to address this above cited paper specifically. It can be shown here how Gammaraybursts and Fast radio bursts are in fact, the same phenomena but occurring at different length timescales. An FRB is just a very short GRB. Nothing else. And more importantly it can be shown how these phenomena are not explosions at all, but rather purely optical effects coming originally from very distant but constant stellar sources in a non expanding universe. It’s not hard to show that the data in the above cited CHIME paper indeed backs up the GRB/FRB model described here. 

(It is important to point out that as far as this blog is concerned, repeating FRB’s should not in any way be considered to be caused by the same mechanisms as non repeating FRB’s. Which as anyone who is familiar with both repeating and non repeating FRB data will agree. Both types have distinctly different types of data streams that distinguish each type from the other as unrelated.)

For clear evidence  relating GRB and FRB as the same phenomena at different timescales look only to Figure 5 in the CHIME/FRB collaboration paper. (“PA profile of FRB 20250316A as a function of frequency over 400–800 MHz.”)

Notice how the self similar burst profiles in each frequency become more stretched in the time axis at successively lower frequencies. And that this  stretch in the time scale is proportional to wavelength. This exact profile of longer wavelengths being dilated to longer arrival timescales for FRB and GRB’s was predicted and outlined in this blog more than 20 years ago. Before Fast radio bursts were even “discovered” I had modelled and explained FRB ‘s in detail as being just very short GRB’s. But with the same distinctive time lag/wavelength relationship that can be seen in every available GRB burst dataset to date. A wavelength/time lag relationship which can also seen in figure 5 of the recent CHIME Collaboration paper. Notice as pointed out elsewhere on this blog, that all GRB light curve profiles from gamma to radio show the same distinctive wavelength to timescale stretch proportional to wavelength relationship. 

Unfortunately, theorists currently seem unwilling to admit relativity and the Big Bang are failed theories. And that going back to a more correct scientific model of light as a wave only, is the only option left to correctly explain all EMR phenomena including FRB burst profiles. A wave only classical model first described centuries ago by Theorists such as Thomas Young.

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2014/08/this-following-brief-description-of-grb.html

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2016/10/ives-stillwell-is-consistent-with.html