FRB 20250316A: A Brilliant and Nearby One-off Fast Radio Burst Localized to 13 pc Precision

FRB 20250316A: A Brilliant and Nearby One-off Fast Radio Burst Localized to 13 pc Precision

The CHIME/FRB Collaboration:, Thomas C. Abbott

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/adf62f#apjladf62fs3

Once again the theorists have misunderstood the true nature of FRB and GRB phenomena. As I have pointed out for decades on this blog, it is a mistake to assume they are massive “explosions” at cosmological scale distances from earth. This is a false assumption based on other false assumptions about our universe and the true nature of electromagnetic radiation. False and unsubstantiated assumptions which I have discussed and refuted elsewhere here on this blog

However, to address this above cited paper specifically. It can be shown here how Gammaraybursts and Fast radio bursts are in fact, the same phenomena but occurring at different length timescales. An FRB is just a very short GRB. Nothing else. And more importantly it can be shown how these phenomena are not explosions at all, but rather purely optical effects coming originally from very distant but constant stellar sources in a non expanding universe. It’s not hard to show that the data in the above cited CHIME paper indeed backs up the GRB/FRB model described here. 

(It is important to point out that as far as this blog is concerned, repeating FRB’s should not in any way be considered to be caused by the same mechanisms as non repeating FRB’s. Which as anyone who is familiar with both repeating and non repeating FRB data will agree. Both types have distinctly different types of data streams that distinguish each type from the other as unrelated.)

For clear evidence  relating GRB and FRB as the same phenomena at different timescales look only to Figure 5 in the CHIME/FRB collaboration paper. (“PA profile of FRB 20250316A as a function of frequency over 400–800 MHz.”)

Notice how the self similar burst profiles in each frequency become more stretched in the time axis at successively lower frequencies. And that this  stretch in the time scale is proportional to wavelength. This exact profile of longer wavelengths being dilated to longer arrival timescales for FRB and GRB’s was predicted and outlined in this blog more than 20 years ago. Before Fast radio bursts were even “discovered” I had modelled and explained FRB ‘s in detail as being just very short GRB’s. But with the same distinctive time lag/wavelength relationship that can be seen in every available GRB burst dataset to date. A wavelength/time lag relationship which can also seen in figure 5 of the recent CHIME Collaboration paper. Notice as pointed out elsewhere on this blog, that all GRB light curve profiles from gamma to radio show the same distinctive wavelength to timescale stretch proportional to wavelength relationship. 

Unfortunately, theorists currently seem unwilling to admit relativity and the Big Bang are failed theories. And that going back to a more correct scientific model of light as a wave only, is the only option left to correctly explain all EMR phenomena including FRB burst profiles. A wave only classical model first described centuries ago by Theorists such as Thomas Young.

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2014/08/this-following-brief-description-of-grb.html

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2016/10/ives-stillwell-is-consistent-with.html

Physicists measured Earth’s rotation using quantum entanglement

Physicists measured Earth’s rotation using quantum entanglement! Since when has classical wave interference become “Quantum interference”?

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/earth-rotation-quantum-entanglement

The experimental setup as described in the original Silverstein et al 2024 experiment is fairly complex compared to the original Sagnac version. However complexity here does not mean it is no longer a basic time of flight Sagnac interferometer with observations consistent with a classical wave only model of light.

I’ve seen similar flights of fantasies of supposed ‘proof of QT’ from other very well known “Quantum” experiments. For instance the Kim et al 1999 Delayed Choice quantum eraser experiment. Where on analysis they had only confirmed the classical model of light. Where light is a wave only and not a photon. 

The technique is also used here. QT ‘researchers’ also have made the experiment as complex as possible so as to disguise the fact that the experiment can still be explained classically without referring to relativity or QT. I have comprehensively dissected Kim et al’s Delayed choice experiment setup and shown how adding complexity is also used to prove Quantum fantasies, at this following link http://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-main-illustrationbelow-is-schematic.html

The same applies to this current 2024 experiment. They manage to pull off this Quantum trick by pretending that somehow ...classical polarised states of wave only light and wave interference are signs of the light being a particle and subject to quantum nuttiness!! 

The fact is that in this experiment there is still only just a path difference detected. And it is detected, as usual for any Sagnac interferometer, via interference patterns. Nothing more. They even admit this is all thats observed. The sleight of hand here is QT dogma at its greatest. They pretended that classical wave interference, observed and documented for centuries by Young and others... is somehow now called “Quantum Interference”

Laughable nonsense as usual from establishment physicists.

Fast Radio Burst mystery solved. They are short Gammaraybursts.

As usual the theorists haven’t the faintest idea about what mechanism produce Fast radio bursts and Gammaraybursts. In their ignorance they think imaginary massive explosions caused by imaginary black holes etc produce these flashes. Some fantasists have even imagined there is a time reversal structure, so desperate is their desire to try to explain why their “explosion” model always fails to model each successive new observation of either Gamma or Fast ray burst data. As these following links show:

https://phys.org/news/2024-04-fast-radio-approach-characterize-behavior.html

https://phys.org/news/2024-04-astrophysics-advances-gamma-ray.html

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aad335/pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095927324000793?via%3Dihub

The actual mechanism of gamma and fast radio bursts is well described by a simple classical model where light is a wave only. GRB and FRB data is only consistent with a model where the universe is infinite and not expanding. And the speed of light is always and only c relative to its source. In other words ignore the all relativity based physics.

DO NOT make up a fantasy model that continually needs to be corrected as the actual data comes in as all established models currently do. Instead base your model on the data first and foremost. Not as an afterthought. If you do, as I do, it will always correctly predict any subsequent new observation. As the link below explains.

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2014/08/this-following-brief-description-of-grb.html

https://physicsexplained.blogspot.com/2019/12/grb-190114c.html

To start with all current data on Fast radio bursts is consistent with them being just very short Gammaraybursts where the burst time line itself is so short that all data above radio frequencies occurs too fast to be measured by our instrumentation above the background noise. So for instance if a FRB is observed to last only seconds, then it’s optical counterpart will be a flash in less then a thousandth of a second and the gammaray part of the burst will last in even smaller timeframes of millionth of a second or less. Too small a time to be measured currently by our latest technology.

Proof of this model is that if one looks at any FRB lightcurve it will always show an exponential decay in peak fluence from hi to low frequencies. Proportional to wavelength. The fluence of the FRB lightcurve lasts for longer times at longer wavelengths. This same decay rate is also observed in all GRB data for all observed wavelengths. Confirming that an FRB is just a very short GRB. 

So that for instance if in a GRB, the gamma lightcurve peaks at t_0 seconds and lasts 20 seconds, then the xray peak will be delayed slightly and last longer. And this trend will continue. Optical peaks later than xray and lasts for even longer. And, the trend continues through IR, far Infrared through to radio. Where shorter radio wavelength parts of the electromagnetic spectrum of the burst will not peak for hours or even days after gamma peaks. And the radio lightcurve also lasts for days and weeks longer than gamma. This model is confirmed by ALL grb and FRB data since they were first observed in the 1990’s.

The delay and stretch of each part of the EM spectrum of any burst will always follow this rule. That is that it will peak and decay later and longer proportional to wavelength.

This model of mine first developed in 1990 when GRBs were not known even to be isotropic. And, not only did I successfully predict  in 1990 that they would be isotropic. I also succesfully predicted that similar rebrightenings in all other wavelengths and lightcurves would be observed to be delayed proportional to wavelength. When no such data had yet even been observed. Nor even considered possible by the fantasies of the ridiculous fact free Neil Gehrels explosion model.

And to date, 35 years later, my models predictions have always been confirmed with each successive year. Whilst the explosion progenitor model’s predictions have failed each year since 1990.

Links to my own theories articles and videos cited above describe in more detail how this “Doppler” effect of light in a classical model can explain all GRB and FRB data. 

But in a nutshell let me here offer a simple analogy: Imagine a gedanken of a flat surface of a large body of water. Create a series of waves of a particular wavelength on this surface. Now imagine you are on a motorboat travelling with and at the same speed as those waves as they propagate across the surface of the water. You don’t measure any up and down of the waves because your are moving at the same speed as those waves. Now speed up and slowly overtake these wavefronts. What do you see or measure? Your boat now bounces up and down slowly as it overtakes/passes each wave crest. Speed your boat up again and those waves will appear to you to be at an even higher frequency. Thus the faster your boat moves, the higher the observed frequency of those waves you overtake will appear to be. Do this same gedanken with lightwaves in a non BBT universe and you will get a GRB.

This is just a Doppler effect. That is what GRB and FRB’s are. No explosions involved